chestnut testing?
Forums
On a different website I was reading that there is evidence that sorrel and chestnut are different as bay and seal are different.
Has anyone else heard of this?
Here is a link to the
Here is a link to the scientific paper on chesnut http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs003359900264 You have to buy the actual article but it states right in the abstract that its the chestnut mutation that is found in the test.
This pdf has information on alternate chestnut mutation ea
I wasn't able to copy the
I wasn't able to copy the link so hopefully manually copied it correctly.
http://www.horse-genetics.com/chestnut-…
It is likely that sorrel is genetically distinct from chestnut, at least in some breeds.
Ahh, thanks for the links I
Ahh, thanks for the links I had misunderstood what you were asking. The hypothesis says that different Agouti alleles lead to different shades? I thought you had meant a separate extension allele like a separate agouti allele.
I have wondered this in the past but it always comes down to the researchers (who actually found the mutations) saying that agouti does not affect chestnut colors. As long as the chestnut test has been available, I believe some stronger correlation would have been found if this were true. Agouti in horses has also been well studied and although it is possible, I feel it is unlikely, another agouti allele will be found.
Personally I think that both liver and flaxen are caused by modifier genes. Flaxen at least is probably polygenic. Liver may be recessive. I personally have seen a Liver stallion (true dark brown liver) produce a very small percentage of Liver foals when bred to mostly chestnut mares so either recessive or polygenic are possible.
These may or may not be the same genes that cause "light black" as we are discussing in another thread.
I think you understood my
I think you understood my question correctly, I think I misunderstood the article!! ;)
It doesn't make sense in my head that agouti would affect a completely different gene, but like agouti has different forms it makes sense that chestnut might, which would account for the extreme in shades.
Ah I have read the sprenger
Ah I have read the sprenger article and if I understand sorta, the agouti thingy(is it a gene or ?) and the chestnut mutation are located at/on the same spot, the extension locus.
Because they are located on the same spot that is why it could be theorized that the agouti had the potential to influence chestnut.
It doesn't make sense in my
[quote]It doesn't make sense in my head that agouti would affect a completely different gene[/quote]
Some genes do affect other genes. For example when gray and silver are both present the foal will gray much faster than normal. I have heard of silver+gray foals being born with the coat already white from gray.
Extension and Agouti do interact. If a horse is recessive at Extension (ie chesntu) then Agouti does not express. If a horse is Ee or EE at Extension then Agouti is allowed to express and will determine if the horse is Black, Brown, or Bay.
The site above is theorizing that Agouti DOES express on a Chesnut horse and will determine the shade of the coat. I just disagree with their conclusion.
It might help to think of extension as a light switch that is either on or off. If it is on (EE or Ee) then the horse is allowed to produce black pigment and you can "see" agouti. Agouti will make the horse Black, Brown, or Bay. If the light switch is off (ee) agouti is still present but you can't "see" it. Kinda like you can't see your couch in the dark but it is still there.
Does that help any?
EDIT: I realized I made a mistake in my analogy. I said agouti but mean extension. I've corrected it.
I find the theory to be off..
I find the theory to be off...as an example, of my 3 sorrels, one is aa, one is Aa and one was AA, however, all three were the exact same shade of sorrel and with the exception of their white patterns could not be distinguished one from the other. Also, my dark chestnut (you guys remember Valley, the ee/aa mare that everyone mistakes for a bay) is genetically identical to Darwin, my ee/aa sorrel.
Hummm, not sure...I do have
Hummm, not sure...I do have some of Valley, but Darwin is a different story...he is camera shy. I have to get him brushed out before taking a pix of him (our weather has made shedding out a bit complicated this year)...give me a few days (Friday or Sat.) and I will have hubby help me while I take his pix...
I'll get an updated pix of all the babies while I'm at it as they have all changed...Miss Emilie is only 11 months and is already as tall as Valley (15 hds)
The extension test tests for
The extension test tests for the actual chestnut mutation so it would be highly unlikely You would have then have liver horses testing Ee or EE instead of ee. The extension test has been around for quite a while and I've heard of no such cases. There was the case a few years ago when a second recessive mutation was discovered. It is rare but horses that carry it look like regular chestnuts not liver. It was discovered when a few horses tested as homozygous for black but then had chestnut foals. This second mutation is now included in the extension tests as well.
It is possible, maybe even probably, that there is a modifier that acts on chestnut to create liver but then it wouldn't be the same as At at Agouti.