What chances test could be worng?
Forums
I have a palomino mare who
I have a palomino mare who out of 10 foals never foaled a foal with only one cream. The only two cream foals she had were double dilutes. Its like flipping a coin and seeing if it lands heads or tails. You may get a bunch of heads in a row but if you flip it 100's of times they come out 50/50.
dakotakdq wrote:My friends
[quote=dakotakdq][b]My friends buckskin stallion was tested Ee aa Crcr. His sire is bay and dam is a smokey grullo.
[/b]
So far he hasnt sired ANY red based foals...
[/quote]
Is it just me, or did anyone else notice that the [b]Ee aa Crcr[/b] stallion is NOT a buckskin? He is a smokey black...can't be buckskin unless he's at least an Aa...lol I believe they are going on his "appearance" which could look washed out or faded and they "assumed" he was a buckskin because his dad was bay or because when bred to agouti positive (Aa) mares he is producing buckskins...
sorry hes Aa, typo error,
sorry hes Aa, typo error, lol
this is him: http://www.freewebs.com/etongrove/lazyd…
The grey mare (shes 26yrs old now) is by a EE black gone grey stallion and out of a black mare that had all black based foals (13 foals to mainly chestnut stallions) so its only a guess she is EE at this stage ;-)
Just lucky. Four is in no way
Just lucky. Four is in no way big enough to be significant.
Though, it is possible the test was wrong. The people doing the tests are only human.