Can you guess why she should not be bred?
Forums
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
I have someone helping me look for that article. When I googled "sickle hocks", just too many hits and not the right ones (in the first two pages or so of hits I went thru'). This article (from memory) explains exactly what the benefits of breeding for slight sickle hocks, and how breeding straight could be causing health problems...that's why I really want to pull it up here for discussion. The concept was a complete 180 from what I've always believed/been taught.
Diane
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
okay. This is my sickle hocked mare. She is leaning forward to get a treat in this photo which throws off the angles a little but you can definitely see it.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/…]
You can see it as a foal as well (although I swear this is not her neck. Where on earth did that come from??!?)
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/…]
She has a huge overstride at the walk, it's beautiful really, and desirable in dressage. I have to laugh about the overstride and the comment about Tennessee Walkers because I have read in numerous places that Tennessee Walkers are the only horses who can do that. Heh. Have they never watched a dressage competition?
Here is how she trots. I have never seen her interfere although you can see she comes very close. She's sensitive so she has probably just learned exactly how far she can step under herself and goes no further.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v338/…]
She's ridden 8-10 times a week and shows several times a year over fences up to 3' (she's a large pony). So... is there something in her conformation allowing for this or does she just have that "thing inside"?
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
I've always been told that if the horse's legs are behind the plumb line when the *canons are perpendicular to the ground* then they are sickle hocked. If they are in front of the line when the canon are perpendicular, then they are post legged. That would mean that all sickle hocked horses are camped out and vice versa, which I why I have *never* used the term camped out.
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
Ha about the young neck! I have that same thing going on with Cyn's neck. It looked SO upright when he was little and so NOT upright now!
Due to the angle of the shot, I'm not sure it's a great one to decide on, but I'm going to see what I can find in the books about it. There are multiple sections on the hind limbs, but the first one in Volume I, indeed shows the plumb line and states that it is sickle hocked if: when the rear cannon is perpendicular to the ground, it falls behind the plumb line. However, it also states that a post legged horse has legs in front of the line, more under rather than straight, and....Lacy's line up, but I KNOW she has open, posty hind leg angulation. SO. How can it be both post legged in one definition and not the other? Let me read on or let someone who doesn't have to refer or re-read books to explain...
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
I think the musculature along the tibia can make a horse look posty even if they are not structurally. Some of the jumpers or distance running horses I have seen LOOK posty, but they could never hold up for what they do if they truly were. Also some of the really stocky horses can look a bit "camped under" (and thus sickle in some people's description) because they have a different curvature of the muscle along the tibia.
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
[quote="accphotography"]I've always been told that if the horse's legs are behind the plumb line when the *canons are perpendicular to the ground* then they are sickle hocked. If they are in front of the line when the canon are perpendicular, then they are post legged. That would mean that all sickle hocked horses are camped out and vice versa, which I why I have *never* used the term camped out.[/quote]
Ahha!! I've just had an epiphany! I'm not sure how it came about, but somehow the term "post-legged", for me, has come to mean something different than what ACC states above, which was what I was originally taught, many, many, waaay to MANY moons ago. The post-leggedness image I've been holding in my brain when we've discussed this is rarely seen outside of the stockbreed halter horse world....
Diane
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
Okay....maybe I'm not having an epiphany...When I first read your post, I envisaged a photo of of the back end of a horse, "front on" so to speak, not from the side, with the plumb lines dropping to the ground, with the cannons being either outside (post) or inside (sickle) the plumb line.
When I think "post-legged", these days, I picture a photo of the front or back leg, standing next to a fence post, and a spirit level would be hard put to tell the difference between the two, no matter where it was placed on the horse. That was my epiphany--that I was using the term "post-legged" in the wrong fashion, and that I have no clue how that came about...
Now, I'm wondering if I need more caffeine! :laugh1
Diane
Re: Can you guess why she should not be bred?
Yes I've heard that too.
My question is, what is "slight"? If that's good for reining? I know that Ser is not "slight", but Khaos *is* - I think - amongst other things....